Don’t Rely Too Much On US Coronavirus Intelligence, Says WHO Mission Member Peter Daszak


2021-02-10 05:51:24

'Don't Rely Too Much' On US Virus Intelligence, Says WHO Mission Member

President Joe Biden “has to look tough on China”, expert Peter Daszak said in a tweet

Wuhan:

US intelligence on the supposed origin of the coronavirus pandemic was not reliable, a member of the special WHO mission to China said Wednesday, after Washington cast doubt on the transparency of the probe.

The World Health Organization mission ended Tuesday without finding the source of the virus, but members had to walk a diplomatic tightrope during their stay, with the US urging a “robust” probe and China warning against politicising the issue.

Information dribbled out via their personal Twitter accounts during the mission, but more details and opinions emerged as they prepared to leave the country.

Peter Daszak, a member of the WHO team, waded directly into the murky geopolitics which covers the pandemic origin story.

President Joe Biden “has to look tough on China”, he said in a tweet, adding: “Please don’t rely too much on US intel: increasingly disengaged under Trump & frankly wrong on many aspects.”

Daszak also tweeted that they worked “flat out under the most politically charged environment possible”.

His comments were linked to an article referencing US state department comments which cast doubt over the transparency of China’s co-operation with the WHO mission.

State Department spokesman Ned Price said the White House “clearly support this investigation”, but shared criticism that China concealed information.

Asked if China had fully cooperated with the WHO team, Price told reporters: “I think the jury’s still out.”

In turn, Beijing emphasised Wednesday that the China probe is just “one part” of an investigation into the origins.

“We hope that the US, like China, will adopt an open and transparent attitude and invite WHO experts to carry out research and studies in the US,” said foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin.

Virus sources

Daszak heads US-based non-profit EcoHealth Alliance, which monitors epidemic outbreaks and has partnered for more than a decade with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on joint research of coronaviruses.

Newsbeep

He has been one of the most vocal proponents of a natural origin, and in comments to AFP last year dismissed the possibility of a leak from the Wuhan lab as a politically motivated “conspiracy theory” pushed by Trump.

Last year, the Trump administration abruptly terminated a US government grant supporting the group’s joint research with the Wuhan facility, a move the scientific community criticized as political.

Despite failing to find the virus origins a year after the pandemic began, the team of foreign experts in China did agree it likely jumped from bats to an unknown animal species before transmitting to humans.

They also concluded the theory of lab experiment gone wrong was “extremely unlikely”, while introducing new avenues of inquiry — chiming with China’s view that it may have originated overseas or have been spread by frozen foods.

Beijing has repeatedly floated the theory that the virus was brought to China through packaging on so-called cold-chain products such as frozen seafood, linking these to various domestic outbreaks in the past few months.

While WHO emergencies chief Mike Ryan has previously said “there is no evidence that food or the food chain is participating in transmission”, the WHO mission members on Tuesday appeared to give weight to China’s theory that it could be carried on cold-chain products.

There had also been widespread concerns about the scientists’ access to data a year on from the outbreak, and amid accusations that Beijing downplayed the initial severity of the outbreak.

Several WHO team members insisted that they were granted full access to the sites and individuals they requested to visit.

But Danish epidemiologist and team member Thea Kolsen Fischer appeared to break ranks, revealing after the briefing that they were not given raw data and instead relied on analyses by Chinese scientists.

“If you come as an outsider and look at the individual, identifiable data, you would most likely — in most scenarios — get access to aggregated data,” she said Tuesday after the briefing, referring to the common practice in most countries.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

55 Comments

  1. MarcosEtess March 4, 2021
  2. WesleyUtiff March 5, 2021
  3. JasonLup March 8, 2021
  4. Randyabemi March 8, 2021
  5. Randyabemi March 9, 2021
  6. Wayneweday March 11, 2021
  7. Jasonker March 11, 2021
  8. Wayneweday March 12, 2021
  9. Jasonker March 12, 2021
  10. Jasonker March 13, 2021
  11. Wayneweday March 13, 2021
  12. Jasonker March 13, 2021
  13. Wayneweday March 14, 2021
  14. Wayneweday March 15, 2021
  15. Michaelzes March 16, 2021
  16. Ricardomus March 16, 2021
  17. Ricardomus March 17, 2021
  18. Michaelzes March 17, 2021
  19. KevinLot March 18, 2021
  20. Ricardomus March 18, 2021
  21. KevinLot March 18, 2021
  22. Ricardomus March 19, 2021
  23. Ricardomus March 20, 2021
  24. MarvinHag March 22, 2021
  25. Terrymex March 22, 2021
  26. MarvinHag March 23, 2021
  27. Peterhed March 25, 2021
  28. MarvinHag March 25, 2021
  29. Peterhed March 26, 2021
  30. Peterhed March 26, 2021
  31. MarvinHag March 26, 2021
  32. Peterhed March 27, 2021
  33. Peterhed March 27, 2021
  34. MarvinHag March 27, 2021
  35. Peterhed March 28, 2021
  36. MarvinHag March 28, 2021
  37. VictorJonge March 30, 2021
  38. Rafaeljap March 30, 2021
  39. VictorJonge March 31, 2021
  40. Frankhem April 1, 2021
  41. Frankhem April 3, 2021
  42. Charlesget April 5, 2021
  43. Michaeltrevy April 5, 2021
  44. Charlesget April 6, 2021
  45. Michaeltrevy April 6, 2021
  46. Alfredted April 7, 2021
  47. Robertnom April 7, 2021
  48. Alfredted April 8, 2021
  49. Robertnom April 8, 2021
  50. Robertnom April 9, 2021
  51. Alfredted April 9, 2021
  52. HarryShife April 10, 2021
  53. Michaelton April 10, 2021
  54. HarryShife April 11, 2021
  55. Michaelton April 11, 2021

Leave a Reply