WhatsApp Asked by Supreme Court to Reply on Petition for Non-Sharing of UPI Data With Facebook, Third Parties

2021-02-01 11:25:06

The Supreme Court Monday asked instant messaging app WhatsApp to file response on a plea seeking a direction to the RBI and the NPCI to ensure that data collected on Unified Payments Interface (UPI) platforms is not shared with their parent company or any other third party under any circumstances.

A bench of Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian said if WhatsApp does not file its reply, then the averment made in the writ petition filed by petitioner Rajya Sabha MP Binoy Viswam will be taken as accepted.

Several interlocutory applications have been filed in the plea which also seek direction for framing regulation to ensure that data collected on UPI platforms is not “exploited” or used in any manner other than for processing payments.

Senior advocate Arvind Dattar, appearing for WhatsApp India, said however no formal notice has been issued to it in the plea for impleadment in the matter.

Senior advocate V Giri, appearing for Reserve Bank of India, informed the top court that they have filed their reply in the matter.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, also appearing for WhatsApp, said ”WhatsApp Pay” has received all necessary permission.

Senior advocate Krishna Venugopal, appearing for the petitioner, said the last time the court asked the company if Israeli sypware Pegasus has breached their system, it stated that the issue was not pleaded in the petition, which is wrong.

The bench said that it proposes that the petition be tagged with a similar plea pending in the top court and asked the Centre to file an affidavit on the issue of spyware.

Venugopal said that till date Facebook and WhatsApp have not filed a counter-affidavit in the matter, despite the petition being pending for months and they should also be asked to file counter-affidavit. At the fag end of the hearing, the CJI told the counsels for WhatsApp that pleas challenging its new privacy policy are pending before the Supreme Court and posted the matter for further hearing after four weeks.

In its affidavit, the RBI has told the top court that it has no responsibility to conduct “audit of members of United Payments Interface (UPI) ecosystem” and responsibility to ensure that private firms like Google and WhatsApp comply with norms lies with National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI). The RBI also said that the matters related to “data privacy and data sharing” are the domain of the central government.

It also sought dismissal of the PIL filed by Viswam seeking direction to it to frame regulation to ensure that data collected on UPI platforms is not “exploited” or used in any manner other than for processing payments.

The affidavit said: “It is submitted that RBI”s directions issued vide circular dated April 6, 2018 on storage of payment system data pertain only to payment date storage and not sharing or privacy. RBI has not issued any instructions on data sharing by TPAPs (Third Party Application Providers) or the participants of UPI. Matters related to data privacy and data sharing come under the domain of Government of India.”

It said that since NPCI is the owner and operator of the UPI, it would be more appropriate for them to respond on the status of “compliance of WhatsApp with the system rules /procedural guidelines governing UPI”.

Earlier, WhatsApp had denied in the court the allegations that its data can be hacked by Israeli sypware Pegasus, which had led to a controversy last year over breach of privacy following claims that Indian journalists and human rights activists were among those globally spied upon by unnamed entities.

Prior to this, the apex court on October 15, last year had issued notice to RBI and others on the plea of Viswam seeking direction for framing regulation to ensure that data collected on UPI platforms is not “exploited” or used in any manner other than for processing payments.

It had also sought responses of the Centre, RBI, NPCI and others including Google, Facebook, WhatsApp and Amazon on the plea.

“The RBI and NPCI have permitted the three members of ”Big Four Tech Giants” i.e. Amazon, Google and Facebook/WhatsApp (Beta phase) to participate in the UPI ecosystem without much scrutiny and in spite of blatant violations of UPI guidelines and RBI regulations,” the plea has claimed.

The plea has alleged that this conduct of RBI and NPCI put the sensitive financial data of Indian users at huge risks, especially when these entities have been “continuously accused of abusing dominance and compromising data”, among other things.

It said these allegations have become particularly worrisome at a time when India has banned host of Chinese applications on the ground that those applications were or could be used for data theft and could lead to security breaches.

It has further sought a direction that RBI and NPCI should ensure that WhatsApp is not permitted to launch full scale operations of ”WhatsApp Pay” in India without fulfilling all legal compliances to the satisfaction of the court regarding requisite regulatory compliances.

Does WhatsApp’s new privacy policy spell the end for your privacy? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below.


Source link


  1. MarcosEtess March 4, 2021
  2. WesleyUtiff March 5, 2021
  3. Randyabemi March 8, 2021
  4. JasonLup March 8, 2021
  5. Randyabemi March 9, 2021
  6. Wayneweday March 11, 2021
  7. Jasonker March 11, 2021
  8. Jasonker March 11, 2021
  9. Jasonker March 12, 2021
  10. Wayneweday March 13, 2021
  11. Jasonker March 13, 2021
  12. Wayneweday March 14, 2021
  13. Wayneweday March 15, 2021
  14. Michaelzes March 16, 2021
  15. Michaelzes March 16, 2021
  16. Ricardomus March 17, 2021
  17. Michaelzes March 17, 2021
  18. Michaelzes March 17, 2021
  19. KevinLot March 18, 2021
  20. Ricardomus March 18, 2021
  21. KevinLot March 18, 2021
  22. Ricardomus March 19, 2021
  23. Ricardomus March 20, 2021
  24. Terrymex March 22, 2021
  25. MarvinHag March 22, 2021
  26. Terrymex March 22, 2021
  27. MarvinHag March 23, 2021
  28. Peterhed March 25, 2021
  29. MarvinHag March 25, 2021
  30. Peterhed March 25, 2021
  31. Peterhed March 26, 2021
  32. MarvinHag March 26, 2021
  33. Peterhed March 27, 2021
  34. Peterhed March 27, 2021
  35. MarvinHag March 27, 2021
  36. Peterhed March 28, 2021
  37. MarvinHag March 28, 2021
  38. Peterhed March 29, 2021
  39. Rafaeljap March 29, 2021
  40. VictorJonge March 29, 2021
  41. Rafaeljap March 29, 2021
  42. VictorJonge March 30, 2021
  43. Frankhem April 1, 2021
  44. Frankhem April 2, 2021
  45. Charlesget April 4, 2021
  46. Michaeltrevy April 5, 2021
  47. Charlesget April 5, 2021
  48. Charlesget April 7, 2021
  49. Alfredted April 7, 2021
  50. Robertnom April 7, 2021
  51. Robertnom April 8, 2021
  52. Alfredted April 9, 2021
  53. HarryShife April 10, 2021
  54. Michaelton April 10, 2021
  55. HarryShife April 11, 2021
  56. Timothyjak April 11, 2021
  57. Robertovob April 13, 2021
  58. ClaudScoox April 14, 2021
  59. Robertovob April 14, 2021
  60. ClaudScoox April 15, 2021
  61. Robertovob April 15, 2021
  62. ClaudScoox April 16, 2021
  63. Robertovob April 16, 2021
  64. Robertovob April 17, 2021
  65. Pierredob April 18, 2021
  66. Rafaelweilk April 18, 2021
  67. Rafaelweilk April 19, 2021
  68. Rafaelweilk April 20, 2021
  69. ThomasNap April 21, 2021
  70. ThomasNap April 22, 2021
  71. ThomasNap April 23, 2021
  72. ThomasNap April 24, 2021
  73. ThomasNap April 24, 2021
  74. RobertLup April 26, 2021
  75. RobertLup April 27, 2021
  76. VictorHaimb April 29, 2021

Leave a Reply