Enforcement Directorate to examine findings in report on Amazon: Source


2021-02-18 17:51:27

NEW DELHI: India’s financial crime-fighting agency will examine findings in a Reuters report, which revealed that Amazon.com Inc has for years given preferential treatment to a small group of sellers on its India platform and used them to circumvent the country’s foreign investment rules, a senior agency source told Reuters on Thursday.
The Reuters story, which was published on Wednesday, was based on internal Amazon documents dated between 2012 and 2019. It provided an inside look at the cat-and-mouse game Amazon has played with the government, adjusting its corporate structures each time the Centre imposed new restrictions aimed at protecting small traders.
On Thursday, a senior Enforcement Directorate source told Reuters that “we will be examining findings” of the story. The subject matter “is not entirely new for us,” said the source, without elaborating. The source asked not to be identified.
Amazon didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Amazon is already under investigation by Enforcement Directorate for possible violation of foreign investment rules. Such probes typically take years, and in most cases details aren’t made public.
In the Reuters report published on Wednesday, Amazon said it was confident of its compliance, when asked about the agency’s probe.
In tweets issued on Wednesday, Amazon criticized the Reuters report as “unsubstantiated, incomplete, factually incorrect,” without going into specifics. “In last several years, there have been (a) number of changes in regulations; Amazon has on each occasion taken rapid action to ensure compliance,” the company said.
In an e-mail to employees on Thursday, Amazon’s India head Amit Agarwal addressed the Reuters story, saying he understood “such instances can be distracting.”
The company was on “the threshold of creating a legacy,” he wrote in the e-mail, which was reviewed by Reuters. “It will require significant innovation, it will push our abilities, we will be misunderstood, but it will be fulfilling.”
Retailers, who are a crucial part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s support base, have long alleged that e-commerce giants like Amazon and Walmart’s Flipkart flout government regulations and that their business practices hurt small traders. The companies deny the allegations.
The documents reviewed by Reuters revealed that Amazon helped a small number of sellers prosper on its India platform, giving them discounted fees and helping one cut special deals with big tech manufacturers such as Apple Inc.
The company has also exercised significant control over the inventory of some of the biggest sellers on Amazon.in, the documents show, even though it says publicly that all sellers operate independently on its platform.
Government rules announced in 2016 required that an e-commerce platform should “not exercise ownership” over sellers’ inventory.
Gopal Krishna Agarwal, a national spokesman for BJP party, said the findings in the Reuters story were “serious” and that “any predatory policy, deep discounting … will not be tolerated by the government. The party will take a stand on that.”
Small businesses are “very important” for the party, he said. “Their concerns will be taken care of.”
In a written response to the Reuters report published on Wednesday, Amazon said it “does not give preferential treatment to any seller on its marketplace,” and that it “treats all sellers in a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory manner.”
A leading group of Indian retailers urged the government to ban the local operations of Amazon and said it was considering taking legal action, after the Reuters story was published.
The Confederation of All India Traders, which says it represents 80 million retail stores, said “the shocking revelations” are “sufficient enough to immediately ban operations of Amazon in India.”
Amazon did not respond to a request for comment on the trader group’s statement.



Source link

48 Comments

  1. cheap wigs February 22, 2021
  2. MarcosEtess March 4, 2021
  3. WesleyUtiff March 6, 2021
  4. Michaelhom March 8, 2021
  5. Randyabemi March 8, 2021
  6. Randyabemi March 9, 2021
  7. Michaelhom March 10, 2021
  8. JeffreyGog March 11, 2021
  9. Wayneweday March 11, 2021
  10. JeffreyGog March 12, 2021
  11. Wayneweday March 12, 2021
  12. JeffreyGog March 13, 2021
  13. JeffreyGog March 14, 2021
  14. JeffreyGog March 14, 2021
  15. JeffreyGog March 15, 2021
  16. Stanleycak March 16, 2021
  17. Stanleycak March 17, 2021
  18. ThomasHaf March 18, 2021
  19. endabenia March 18, 2021
  20. ThomasHaf March 19, 2021
  21. ThomasHaf March 20, 2021
  22. Ricardomus March 20, 2021
  23. ElmerJearo March 22, 2021
  24. MarvinHag March 22, 2021
  25. ElmerJearo March 23, 2021
  26. MarvinHag March 23, 2021
  27. Jasoncok March 25, 2021
  28. Jasoncok March 26, 2021
  29. MarvinHag March 27, 2021
  30. Jasoncok March 28, 2021
  31. MarvinHag March 28, 2021
  32. MarvinHag March 28, 2021
  33. Scottrhync March 29, 2021
  34. Scottrhync March 30, 2021
  35. Scottrhync April 1, 2021
  36. Scottrhync April 2, 2021
  37. Scottrhync April 3, 2021
  38. Stevenstazy April 4, 2021
  39. Charlesget April 5, 2021
  40. Stevenstazy April 5, 2021
  41. Charlesget April 6, 2021
  42. Stevenstazy April 7, 2021
  43. BillyViz April 7, 2021
  44. Alfredted April 7, 2021
  45. BillyViz April 8, 2021
  46. BillyViz April 9, 2021
  47. JamesBrivy April 10, 2021
  48. JamesBrivy April 11, 2021

Leave a Reply